Tuesday, May 21, 2013
   
TEXT_SIZE

Featured Columnists

May 14 - Columnist Buddy Carter: Enough is Enough

NEWS - Featured Columnists

By Sen. Buddy Carter

May 14, 2013 – Last week, the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) held a public hearing to solicit comments on the draft wastewater permit for King American Finishing (KAF) located in Screven County. The hearing was held at the Effingham County High School in Springfield and, although I was not there, I understand it was well attended.

I also understand that the majority, if not all, of the people in attendance were opposed to the permit being issued.

Add me to that list.

In a letter dated May 10, 2013, I have informed EPD that I am opposed to the issuance of the proposed permit.

The proposed wastewater permit is the second issued to KAF since May 2011, when more than 38,000 fish, along with other wildlife such as alligators, turtles and birds, died in the largest recorded aquatic environmental incident in Georgia history. The dead fish and other wildlife were located downstream from the discharge pipe of King America.

Since the time of this ecological disaster, the events and actions of EPD have been well documented:
• Since 2006, KAF had been operating two flame retardant lines and had increased its wastewater discharge without getting the proper permits or disclosing it to EPD.
• Although EPD had inspected KAF several times after the fire retardant lines were installed, it was not detected by EPD.
• Under a consent order signed by EPD and KAF in September of 2011, KAF is only required to complete approximately $1 million in environmental projects on the Ogeechee River.
• In August of 2012, a wastewater permit was issued by EPD and subsequently withdrawn, citing the need for KAF to complete an antidegradation analysis, demonstrating that the lowering of water quality is necessary to accommodate important socioeconomic benefits.

That brings us to where we are today. EPD will accept written comments up until the close of business on May 15.  The proposed permit will be reviewed and likely issued in late July or August.

So why am I opposing it now?

Simply put, the public’s faith in EPD’s competency and ability to protect our environment and property owners has diminished to the point that it gets a vote of no confidence.

My dealings with EPD dates back to my service as mayor of the City of Pooler in the mid 1990s when we were establishing the groundwork for the tremendous growth that Pooler continues to experience today.

At that time we fought many battles with EPD trying to get water withdrawal permits for our growing city and found it to be extremely difficult to work with it.

While serving in the Georgia state legislature in 2006, we reached an agreement with then EPD director Dr. Carol Couch to send notification via registered letters to property owners whose land had been reclassified as a result of flood map revisions. The agreement was nixed after Dr. Couch left and a new director was named.

However, while trying to implement this notification process it was discovered that the flood maps used by EPD and county digest maps identifying property owners would not overlap and therefore property owners could not be identified.

As a result of this dilemma, I sponsored legislation creating the Georgia Geospatial Commission, a group of volunteers from public agencies, universities and government who would work to coordinate and compile geographical information in our state.

After three successful years, the commission sunset last June and this year I sponsored SB11, recreating the commission to continue its fine work.

Citing the objections of state agencies, and although it passed in the State Senate unanimously, SB11 was vetoed last week.

EPD’s handling of the Ogeechee River disaster has been horrible. Communication with local legislators has been non-existent and citizen outcry has been brushed off as fanatical.

It is because of this pattern of poor communication and performance that EPD has earned a vote of no confidence by the public and the reason I oppose this permit at this time.

During my years of public service, economic development has been one of my proudest accomplishments.

Jobs are important to our state and so is our environment. KAF and our environment can and will co-exist. As a conservative, I believe there is no contradiction between protecting our environment and supporting the economy – we can and will do both.

Before any permit is approved, EPD must do a better job of communicating to elected officials and especially to our citizens and instilling in all of us the confidence that they can adequately guarantee the safety of our taxpayers, property owners and environment.

 

May 13 - Columnist Dennis Hooper: 'First Followers' as Leaders

NEWS - Featured Columnists

Building Future Leaders

by Dennis Hooper

May 13, 2013 – When I have the privilege of initial conversations with leaders, I often ask, “Do you lead followers, or do you lead leaders?” After a typically uneasy pause and a somewhat confused look, the response is usually something like, “Followers. Of course I lead followers.”

I then ask, “How would their behaviors be different if you led leaders instead of followers?” Another awkward pause ends with thoughtful imaginations about the sizable improvement that might exist.

A final follow-up question: “How would your behaviors be different if you led leaders instead of leading followers?” Another uncomfortable and slightly embarrassed silence typically yields to thoughts of sharing more information and gathering more input on critical decisions.

My final thought-provoking question is, “Considering the current culture of your organization, would it be easier for those under your authority to change their behavior, or could you change your behaviors more easily?”

Think about those questions for yourself. They obviously bring up questions about the meaning of “leadership” and “following.” Further, they likely cause you to think in a different way about the influence you have on establishing the culture of your organization.

I had the experience recently of thinking in a fresh way about the overlapping roles of followers and leaders. The facilitator at a recent seminar shared an intriguing three-minute video. To shake your perspective in a productive and beneficial way, please look at this website where a creative entrepreneur named Derek Sivers narrated this video: sivers.org/ff

The video itself (filmed originally by Michael Hughes and posted on youtube.com) is of a dancing man who initiates a movement at a rock concert, but Derek’s analysis is worthy of study by any leader. For the rest of this article, I want to highlight some gems of information taken from Derek’s narrative.

The first follower serves a crucial role. The first follower courageously shows others how to follow. Subsequent followers emulate the first followers more than they do the leader. Being a first follower is a very under-appreciated form of leadership.

The leader embraces the first follower as an equal. It’s no longer about the leader and a creative, unique idea. The welcome collaboration between the leader and the first follower puts the focus now on the joint effort, not on either individual. The concept becomes the attraction, and the leader and first follower merely facilitate the involvement of additional interested individuals.

The second follower is the tipping point. Notice that the first two individuals invite others to join in. Had the effort been exclusive, subsequent followers would not have felt welcome. However, the receptive environment builds momentum as more individuals choose to engage in the effort.

This video and its narration helped me understand my role over thirty years. I was never the visionary, but I was an excellent “vision runner.” In terms of this video, I was the “first follower.”

If you are typically a “first follower” or a “vision runner,” be inspired by your unique contributions as you contemplate this video. You may rarely receive accolades, but your leadership role is crucial!

If you are a visionary, learn in a fresh way the importance of welcoming those who join with you to make your ventures successful. Express intentional appreciation to your “first followers” and “vision runners,” as they likely feel undervalued much of the time.

For more on this concept, visit my website, click on the “Article Archives” page, and scroll down to the article entitled “Visionaries and Vision Runners.” And please know that I welcome your comments.

Dennis Hooper is an Executive Coach in Atlanta, helping organizations build future leaders. If you want to see his article referenced above – and more than 300 additional leadership articles – his Web site is www.buildingfutureleaders.com. You may contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or 404-575-3050.copyright © 2013, published in the Savannah Business Journal on Mon., May 13, 2013

 

May 3 - Columnist Buddy Carter: Red Fish Can't Jump

NEWS - Featured Columnists

By Sen. Buddy Carter

May 3, 2013 – Some of my fondest memories of growing up in coastal Georgia are of going fishing with my dad.

While I enjoyed fresh water fishing, my favorite was salt water.  I remember studying the tide charts in the paper and hoping that the right tide would coincide with his days off.

I grew up in west Chatham County and therefore it was closer for us to go fishing in South Carolina near Hilton Head Island.  I remember I always had to add one hour to the tide charts in the Savannah paper for the correct South Carolina tides.

Although we fished year round, the fall of the year was the best time for us.

When we would leave our home in Port Wentworth, my dad would always tell me to look and see which way the smoke in the neighboring paper mill’s smokestack was blowing.  If the northeast wind was blowing, we knew we were probably not going to do as well since the tide would not be able to get fully out of the marsh.

We would mainly catch trout and spot-tailed bass.  It was only years later that I learned that a spot-tailed bass was actually called a red drum or redfish.

It really didn’t matter what they were called, all I knew was that they really put up a fight and they were loads of fun to catch.

It’s because of these childhood memories that I chose to sponsor HB 36 in the Senate this year.

HB 36, which was sponsored in the House by Rep. Ben Watson (R-Savannah) and passed both chambers overwhelmingly, provides game fish status for red drum.

Red drum was designated as a game fish in federal waters by President George W. Bush.

In South Carolina and Florida, red drum is classified as a game fish. 

Designation as a game fish means the species can not be sold and can only be legally taken by means of pole and line.

As the population of the red drum begins to dwindle, it is important that we put safeguards in place to ensure this specie’s viability in order for future generations to enjoy and experience.

Currently, there are 31 species of freshwater fish of recreational importance that are classified as game fish.  If signed into law by Gov. Nathan Deal as expected, red drum will become the first saltwater fish in Georgia to be designated as a game fish.  The red drum is already designated as the state saltwater fish of Georgia.

If not classified as game fish, species may be taken by bow and arrow, cast nets, seines and other fishing gear.  For species such as the red drum, where the harvest is regulated by a 14-23 inch slot length and a daily possession limit of 5 fish, this can be a big problem.

Without HB 36, when the commercial sale of red drum was permitted, it is believed a “black market,” in which red drum were illegally captured and sold to the public on a wide scale, existed.  In fact, over the past five years, annual reported sales of red drum have been less than 500 pounds.

A proposed amendment to HB 36 that would allow 10% of the total pounds of red drum caught annually to be sold by licensed seafood dealers, was not considered as it was felt that farm-raised red drum from Texas and wild-caught red drum from North Carolina that can be legally sold in Georgia would satisfy consumer demand.

Coastal fishing contributes nearly $500 million per year to our coastal communities.  More than 150 professional fishing guides depend on a growing and productive fishery to sustain their business.

Protecting the red drum by designating this species a game fish as HB 36 does, will help ensure the economic viability of our coast.

More importantly, HB 36 will help to protect the spot-tailed bass.  It will help a boy learn how to read a tide chart, how to tell which way the wind is blowing by looking at a smokestack and create memories that will last a lifetime.       

Sen. Buddy Carter can be reached at 421-B State Capitol, Atlanta, GA, 30334.  His Capitol office number is 404-656-5109. You can connect with him on Facebook at facebook.com/buddycarterga or follow him on Twitter @Buddy_Carter.

   

April 29 - Columnis Dennis Hooper: Building Confidence in Your Children and Grandchildren

NEWS - Featured Columnists

Building Future Leaders

by Dennis Hooper

April 29, 2013 – An aspect of leadership that has intrigued me for years is the interplay between competence and confidence. “Competence” is the ability to execute specific skills. My clients typically hire me to help them enhance their competence and build skills in their future organizational leaders.

“Confidence” is a more elusive quality. How does an individual acquire (or enhance) his or her confidence? I gained some insight recently in dealing with one of my very confident clients.

We discussed his obvious comfort (confidence) in dealing with a wide variety of circumstances and his optimistic approach in facing new challenges. He shared some insights about his upbringing that stimulated me to write this article. I want to share (and internalize) what I learned in that conversation.

You love your kids and grandkids, don’t you? I sure love mine. Because we know a lot and they know very little, we love helping them grow by building their knowledge and skills (competence). We assess their growth by observing their achievements, the “what” that is the outcome of their efforts. (My two-year old grandson loves to triumphantly exclaim, “I did it!”) As they gain skill, we say “Good job!” and their confidence in their abilities (competence) grows.

Whether child or adult, we all routinely face new situations. We’re likely confident in facing the challenges when we know we have the skills that will be required. But what happens when we face a new situation that we’ve never encountered before? Or what if we just suffered a huge failure, and the results we envisioned so clearly seem exceptionally elusive?

Confidence in these unfamiliar situations is what reveals real leadership. Can we be confident in embracing the process of being challenged, even if we aren’t sure what content may be required?

Some people, like my client mentioned above, seem so naturally confident in approaching those unknown situations. How can we build that kind of confidence in our kids and grandkids?

Maybe one of the most important concepts we can teach our kids is to “figure it out.” That is, perhaps we should be teaching our children that they have the capacity to creatively generate options when they face a tough challenge. And they have the capability to choose from among those options one apparently viable possibility that will likely deliver the outcome they desire.

We should then compliment the child for taking action to resolve the situation. When the dust has settled and the outcome has been attained, we should ask the child to reflect on “What did you do well?” and “What might you do differently next time you face a situation like this?”

The child may not recognize that he or she was successful in figuring out how to deal with the situation. We should point that out and celebrate the act, even if the outcome is not very remarkable. Notice that this is contrary to our natural tendency, which is to celebrate and reward if the quality of the outcome is good and criticize if the result is less desirable.

We should be rewarding the child’s effort. The more difficult the situation (and maybe the more creative the action taken), the greater we should celebrate.

As we consider with the child what he or she did well and what could be done differently next time, we should pause and point out the process that occurred for the child. We should emphasize that he or she DID think through the situation, made a choice, and executed the decision. That is, he or she took a big step in developing the confidence to handle all kinds of tough future situations.

Instead of focusing on the content of this particular situation, we should help the child see the process that has taken place. By focusing on “you figured it out,” we reinforce the development of the child’s innate assurance that “I can confidently address just about any situation that might come up!”

That way of thinking is so very different from what my parents did with me, and even different from what I did with my child. However, I intend to take that approach – affirming the “figure it out” effort – with my grandchild as often as I can. Is that something you might consider, too?

Dennis Hooper is an executive coach in Atlanta, serving leaders who are building intentionally collaborative cultures. His Web site is www.buildingfutureleaders.com. You may contact Dennis at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or 404-575-3050. copyright © 2013

 

April 17 - Columnist Buddy Carter: Reflecting on the Legislative Session

NEWS - Featured Columnists

By Sen. Buddy Carter
“Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.”
– Potter Stewart
April 17, 2013 – During the recently completed legislative session, one of the hottest topics discussed was ethics.  With the passage of HB 142 and HB 143 on the last day of the session, ethics reform, or at least the beginning of such, was finally achieved.
Although ethics reform has been discussed for many years, many feel it was brought to the forefront when news of a $17,000 lobbyist paid trip to Europe in 2010 for House Speaker David Ralston became public.
During the 2012 session, Sen. Josh McKoon (R-Columbus) introduced SB 391 that would have imposed a $100 cap on lobbyist gifts. Although the bill did not pass, groups such as the Georgia Tea Party Patriots, Common Cause Georgia and Georgia Conservatives in Action, supported the intent and rallied behind the proposal.
Questions on whether Georgia should limit gifts from lobbyists to legislators were placed on both the Democratic and Republican ballots during the 2012 Georgia primaries.
73 percent of Democratic voters expressed support for a limitation of unlimited gifts while 87 percent of Republican voters expressed support for a more specific $100 gift cap.
As a result of this overwhelming response, ethics reform moved to the forefront of issues during this year’s session.
In fact, the State Senate adopted a $100 gift limit as part of their self governing rules during the first day of the session.  Although this limit went into effect immediately (before lunch on the first day) and was adhered to by senate members throughout the session, HB’s 142 and 143, which apply to both the House and Senate as well as local elected officials in Georgia, did not pass until the last day.
The onerous process involved in producing the bills led one Senator to refer to them as “the good, the bad and the ugly.”  His explanation of this analogy was that while there were good parts and bad parts to the bills, the ugly part was the fact that House and Senate conferees did not reach a final compromise until 3AM in the morning of the final day.
Nevertheless, a compromise was reached, the bills did pass and, upon the expected signing by Gov. Nathan Deal, ethics reform will become law.
HB 142, which deals primarily with limitations on what gifts lobbyists may give to public officers, proved to be the most contentious of the two bills.  Highlights of the bill are a limit of $75 on expenditures for food, beverages and other items, and a total ban on the practice of lobbyists providing public officers with tickets to athletic, musical, or other entertainment events, regardless of the cost involved.
While lobbyists may still pay domestic travel costs for a public officer and necessary staff attending a meeting or conference directly related to the official duties of that public officer, reimbursement for international travel is now prohibited.
Perhaps the most difficult compromise to this bill dealt with the requirements for who must register as a lobbyist.  Under the definition of a “lobbyist” in HB 142, anyone who receives or anticipates receiving more that $250 per calendar year in compensation or reimbursement of expenses specifically for promoting or opposing legislation by the General Assembly must now register as a lobbyist.
The other ethics bill, HB 143, primarily deals with candidates for local offices.  Saddled with the burden of electronically filing disclosure reports even if they raised or spent no money whatsoever on a campaign, HB 143 now allows local candidates to file notice that they do not intend to accept or spend more that $2,500, thus exempting them from reporting requirements.
HB 143 also allows local candidates to file disclosure reports with the county election superintendent or the municipal clerk.
Although ethics reform is a work in progress and these two bills are far from perfect, they do make improvements to the process.
However, just as we have learned that you can’t legislate morality, we know that you can’t make someone be ethical- crooks will be crooks.
But HBs 142 and 143 raise the bar a little higher and while they may not say what is right to do at least they do say what you have a right to do.
   

Page 1 of 28

Banner

User Login




Forgot login?
Register

SavDaily

Follow Us!

Twitter

Biz Photo Gallery